Campaigners say a proposed permanent car park near the foot of a popular Lakeland fell has polarised arguments.
Friends of the Lake District pointed out that the facility at Ullock Moss near Portinscale is in contravention of the national park’s planning policies.
The facility has demonstrated the conflict between the need to provide parking for the thousands who ascend Cat Bells and the park authority’s vision for smarter travel.
The car park at Ullock Moss was first in operation during summer 2020 under permitted development rules which normally allow land to be used for car parking without planning permission for 28 days which was extended to 56 days during the Covid-19 crisis as an emergency measure in response to the influx of visitors experienced when the first lockdown was lifted.
The charity said several temporary car parks were created in the open countryside under the relaxation of the rules.
The Friends said: “Many responses have already been submitted to this planning application, including from local residents of Portinscale and landscape charity Friends of the Lake District who recognise the need for parking and traffic issues to be addressed in the location, close to the major tourist hub of Keswick, but do not view the proposal as an acceptable or appropriate solution.
“Their concern is that a car park will set a precedent which could have a major bearing on the wider future of the Lake District, what it will look like and what it will become.
“Importantly, the proposal is in direct conflict with the [Lake District National Park Authority]’s own planning policies relating to the location of new car parks and when they would be allowed. This includes current policies and, to an even greater degree, those in their new local plan, which is expected to come into force imminently. it also conflicts with the national park management plan and the vision for smarter travel in the park.”
The Lingholm Trust has submitted the application. The Cumbria Way long-distance path runs through the area.
The Friends said the national park policies and plans all establish that reducing travel by car to, from and within the park is a top priority alongside providing a range of integrated, sustainable travel options.
Lorayne Wall, planning officer at Friends of the Lake District said: “Allowing a new car park in this location threatens to set back plans for sustainable travel and a low-carbon Lake District before they even get started.
“Instead, we are urging the LDNPA to stick to its plans and policies and follow the lead of Snowdonia national park in implementing them.
“Traffic, parking issues and carbon emissions continue to rise and it is imperative that we do not undermine the opportunity for a more sustainable future by continuing with a business-as-usual ad-hoc approach to the localised parking problems that impact on many of our communities.”
The charity said many in opposition to the Ullock Moss proposal want the authority to send a clear message that proposals to make permanent any temporary car parks allowed under the currently relaxed permitted development rules will not automatically be looked upon favourably and will require the same scrutiny as any other new proposal under the strict criteria set out in the local plan.
Submissions on the proposals can be made up to 5 March on the Lake District National Park Authority website, using the application reference number 7/2020/2291.
Lakeslover
23 February 2021Sadly the views of ‘the friends’ are in total opposition to the vast majority of people who wish to enjoy the National park. Until such time as a cheap, accessible transport network is established which provides multipoint access to fellsides (not towns and villages) then people will still need - note NEED, not want - to use a car. Much better to accept this and provide suitable parking spots rather than force people into lay-bys and passing places.
As for this obsession with trapping the park in some outdated version of the 1950s. Less said the better.
TH
24 February 2021Either get the boat or walk from Keswick. Then a car park is not required.
Sheepy
24 February 2021The LDNPA Planning department are an absolute joke.
They just make the rules up as they go along and the massive document containing the core principles is completely ignored when it comes to planning.
They have no rhyme or reason to their decisions and when pressed you find out they don't even follow or understand their own rules.
timbo
24 February 2021Lakeslover, your 20th century view of travel is out of date. We are over run by cars. They are a nuisance on most of the Lake Districts roads. The sooner we have to leave them at the NP boundary the better.
Deurgar
24 February 2021There's no need to use a car to go for a walk up Catbells. Well done to the Friends for standing up for the people who love the Lake District. More and bigger car parks aren't the future.
Latrigg
24 February 2021I agree with Sheepy, the LDNPA are a joke are are NOT Guardians of this National Park, just Guardians of their own careers. With people like Long, Nichols, etc they have the worst planning department in the whole of the UK. They go against their own policies, policies which they have been paid a lot of money to set out!
The Government has slashed funding to repair Cumbria's roads by £10.5 million, so us locals are the ones who will pay for all of the potholes whilst LDNPA will gain for creating more Parking, Premier Inns, 24 hour garages, ugly Caravan Parks for tourists, etc.
Friends of the Lake District want to wise up a lot because they state that they don't get involved in LITTLE planning matters, but little planning matters turn into big ones.
Lee
24 February 2021I agree with what other people have said it's typical isn't it. People want to walk up Cat Bells and they just park up and down the road below the s-bends. Beats me why they don't slap a parking ticket on them all. The message would soon get around and inconsiderate visitors wouldn't be blocking our roads.
Peter
25 February 2021Hi guys,
This is not a Application from the lingholm estate!
Please check your Facts.
Bob
25 February 2021Apologies for the error. We've amended the story
Dave
02 March 2021The 'friends of' organisations are the same everywhere, be it the Lake District, Peak or anywhere else. They complain about parking yet do everything possible to attack and block attempts to relieve the issue.
They are not friends of the Lake District, they only care for the best outcome for themselves. They just want fewer visitors to the NP for their own selfish reasons, despite the damage it would inflict on the tourism industry.
Useless
10 March 2021"We enjoy the Lake District; we just don't want so many *other* people enjoying it."