The charity that played a part in the setting up of a national park in the Lake District has thrown its weight behind calls to protect it from developments it says threaten its character.
The Friends of Lake District says it has set up its Save Our Lake District campaign in the face of numerous recent controversial plans and decisions.
The Friends’ chairman Douglas Chambers said the national park appears to be under siege: “The number of contentious situations when proposals for new developments within the Lake District national park have been challenged appear to be increasing. Objections from local communities, threats of judicial reviews and claims that ‘nobody listens’ are bad enough on an individual basis, but this is now an epidemic, and epidemics have to be stopped.
“Recreational vehicles on fell tracks, gondolas, inappropriate path surfaces and now gentleman’s yachts on Grasmere. Your national park is under siege while the statutory protection for its fragile beauty is being ignored. This must stop.
“The national media are asking what and who are national parks for, so we must act now to ensure the Lake District is managed in line with the principles and statutory purposes of national parks and that we protect its natural beauty.
“Everyone now realises the importance of physical and mental health in our day to day lives, and this was recognised by our national parks’ founders.”
The Lake District National Park Authority has come under fire in recent months over plans for a gondola cable car at Whinlatter; the resurfacing of the former Keswick to Threlkeld railway route in asphalt; the refusal to legislate against motor vehicle use of two green lanes in the Little Langdale area, and previously perceived support for zipwires in locations deemed by opponents to be inappropriate. Keswick Town Council passed a motion of no confidence in the park authority.
The latest battle is brewing over proposals by the Lowther Estate to place ‘gentleman’s yachts’ on Grasmere. The authority is due to determine whether such use needs planning consent.
The National Trust, which owns large parts of Lake District countryside including Grasmere Island and some of the lake’s shore, opposes the mooring of the 10 yachts, which would be up to 12m long and electrically propelled and used for overnight accommodation and recreational use on the lake.
The trust also campaigned for a traffic order to regulate motorised vehicles on the two routes near its farms at Tilberthwaite.
Mr Chalmers said: “The framework is already there. National parks have their statutory purposes, but here in the Lake District we can see where these are not being recognised or respected.
“We want to see the national park looked after, protected from damaging developments and encouraging those that conserve and enhance its natural beauty and cultural heritage. Parks should provide opportunities for free access and enjoyment, and a vital connection with nature for everyone regardless of race, ability or income.
“This is not a call for preservation. That would be destructive for our environment, businesses and communities. But it is a call to ensure that this jewel in the country’s crown is looked after properly – loved and not exploited – so that we and those who follow us can continue to enjoy it.
“As part of the campaign we will be taking part in and organising a number of events that shout loud and clear for the park to be properly managed.”
Social media groups No Go Gondola and Houseboats-off-Grasmere have been vocal in opposing recent developments and plans.
The Friends of the Lake District, which represents CPRE The Countryside Charity in Cumbria, says its campaigning helped lead to the creation of the Lake District national park. It has owned land in the area since 1937 and was also foremost in the campaign that led to the extension of the boundaries of the Lake District and Yorkshire Dales national parks.
Mike Jack
20 January 2020The attraction of the area is that it is without the ‘amusement’ type of activity that can be found elsewhere. Also minus McDonalds and the main supermarkets. The fells and lakes in the full glory of their natural charm. The proposals put forward under the banner of ‘inclusion’ are far from the ethos that the park should be promoting.
Martin Evans
21 January 2020The park is to preserve the natural beauty of the area which, had been developed by the Victorians, but history also back hundreds of years from lead, copper anx slate mineing. The custodians of the Lake District must be the only ones to proposd any development to maintain and enhance the truelly unique experience that is there now. Grasmere is a small lake and no more than a row boat is suitable, it is the jewel in the crown. Unless you work and live there hands off.
local man
21 January 2020The so called friends of the lake district state they want people to enjoy access to the Lake district regardless of Race ABILITY or income yet they object to plans to make the Keswick Threlkeld
railway route more Wheelchair friendly with an all weather surface,a typical selfish statement from a body which numbers some members more interested in protecting the value of their second homes and holiday lets.
Christine Thornton
21 January 2020The Lake District National Park is exactly that ...our Park..a place of Cumbrian history and beauty a place of breathtaking views with a landscape like no other for us all to enjoy.
The local people who live and work in Cumbria now benefit from tourism of that there is no doubt but progressing to all the 'extras' this brings does not enhance the area it simply becomes exactly the same as everywhere else..a provider of toys and entertainment.
The decision to allow 4×4's the freedom they don't deserve was a mistake which needs rectifying. Second homes must be limited and Grasmere is too small for 'gentlemans boats'. Providing an adrenaline busting park is not for the Lake District landscape. Go somewhere else. People love it anyway.
Remember common sense!!!!
DJW
21 January 2020Isn't it about time the national parks (all of them) started to address the question of housing for our local population and started to whack "Local Occupancy Restriction" orders on more properties. They should also encourage local councils to start making holiday homes and second homes pay their full Council Tax.
Theme Parks and WAGI's are not needed.
Jeff Breen
22 January 2020Its such a shame the the leader of the Lake District National Park Authority does not know what the term National Park actually means.
Lorna Lewthwaite
22 January 2020I am disgusted that they want to change our County. Leave us alone, if anyone doesn't like it then stay away. The amount of people who come back year after year say it all. We are unique and wish to remain that way. Leave our unique County alone. If you want to do anything bring jobs back to the area outside the Lake District and get people to visit there. We have a lot to offer, but only to those who want to be there. Take Whitehaven for example, a fantastic Marina but the rest of the town is lacking. The West Coast along St Bees to Seascape. Good walks, good beaches and friendly people. If the man at the top doesn't like what the natives want then he should leave and take his ideas somewhere else