A group of voluntary organisations said the controversial funicular railway on Cairn Gorm should be dismantled.
An engineers’ report released after a freedom of information request said the railway, completed in 2001, is in a poor condition for its age.
The funicular, built to transport skiers to the upper slopes of the mountain, has been closed for more than a year after structural problems came to light. Repairs are likely to cost up to £10m.
Highlands and Islands Enterprise, the public body that owns the railway and ski-resort facilities on the north side of the 1,245m (4,085ft) mountain, is believed to plan to go ahead with repairs, subject to Scottish Government approval.
But a coalition of voluntary groups said no further development should go ahead until a masterplan for the resort is produced.
The Cairngorms Campaign, Campaign for a Better Cairngorm, North East Mountain Trust, Ramblers Scotland and the Scottish Wild Land Group have produced their own ‘vision’ for the future of the mountain, supporting the future of skiing in the context of the uncertainties of climate change.
Its main points are:
- The promised masterplan is long overdue; the time for piecemeal decision making is over
- The ski uplift should be streamlined and upgraded
- The case for repairing the funicular is very weak; no more public money should be wasted
- Only developments that are in keeping with a sensitive high-mountain environment should be considered. The zipwires and mountain coasters proposed by HIE have no place high in Scotland’s finest mountain range when they could be sited elsewhere
- A Centre for the Mountain Environment could provide a sustainable visitor attraction.
A spokesperson for the North East Mountain Trust said: “Over the last few years, the ski area on Cairn Gorm has seen poor management, a lack of investment, the collapse of the company responsible for running it and very serious structural problems with the funicular.
“The situation has been compounded by Highlands and Islands Enterprise’s failure to produce its long promised masterplan and its lack of openness about the costs surrounding either removal or repair of the funicular.
“The situation must be resolved in a way which is both financially and environmentally sustainable and which provides an experience which skiers actually want. At a time of severe financial pressures, the drain on public funding must stop.
“Despite the lack of a masterplan, HIE continues to submit planning applications for developments which cannot be judged by the planning authorities in the context of a future vision for the mountain.
“Equally worryingly, it is understood that HIE will submit a proposal shortly to the Scottish Government to repair the funicular, and the latter may well take a decision on this, before the publication of a masterplan. Given the major implications for the public purse and the interest the Auditor General has taken in the financial aspects of the recent management of the ski company, along with the lack of opportunity for public scrutiny, this is wholly unacceptable.
The trust’s chair David Windle added: “Cairn Gorm is a national asset. It is too important for skiers, the economy of Speyside and the thousands of members of the public who visit annually for decisions to be taken incrementally.
“The time for secrecy is over. We call on HIE and Fergus Ewing, the cabinet secretary responsible, to postpone any decisions on the future of funicular and potential infrastructure developments until after a public consultation on the proposed masterplan.
“Unless this happens, large sums of money may well be spent on developments which do not meet skiers’ needs and which are totally out of keeping with a high mountain environment.”
The groups’ masterplan said downhill skiing should be developed on ‘a light and lean’ basis and may well be confined to Coire Cas, with modern ski lifts. These should end below the top of the plateau where frequent high winds make skiing unpleasant. A more compact ski area would allow snow making to be used to best advantage. Native trees should be planted widely to enhance the environment, reduce the visual impact and improve the skier experience, particularly in low cloud.
As climate change is likely to make skiing conditions increasingly unpredictable, more bad weather alternatives should be developed in Speyside, it said.
A Centre for the Mountain Environment could be built, learning from the success of the Eden Project in Cornwall. The report said Cairn Gorm and the surrounding area offer outstanding views of high plateau, steep rocky cliffs and deeply incised corries, which impress everybody.
Consultants Adac Structures produced reports in 2018 on both the general state of repair of the funicular and the sliding bearings that sit between the concrete support piers and the superstructure of the railway.
The inspections, released following a Freedom of Information Act application, show widespread problems.
The general report said: “The general condition was thought to be poor for a structure of this age with widespread minor deficiencies giving a general impression of poor quality control during the construction phase.
“Crack patterns seen within the span of the beams, opening joints over the supports and rust staining at a number of these locations all indicate that the recommended deflection criteria are not being met and that corrosion of the reinforcement has started.
“There is no evidence of extensive corrosion at this stage, but it is of concern that corrosion has initiated at this relatively young age.”
Snow-clearing operations had also damaged parts of the structure, it said.
The voluntary groups said the case for repairing the funicular is weak. The consultants’ report commissioned by HIE envisages a much reduced role for the facility. Repair will be very expensive and costs for long term maintenance will continue. “It is no justification to base the case for repair on the argument that this would be a little less costly than removal,” it said. “Removal of the concrete bases below ground level may not be needed, and work could be phased over a number of years, which cannot happen with the repair option.” The future of the Ptarmigan should also be considered in the light of plans to modernise the ski uplift.
The proposed mountain biking tracks and adrenaline rides, including a downhill mountain roller coaster and zipwire, should be placed elsewhere on Speyside in a less environmentally sensitive area, and one less subject to the vagaries of bad weather.
Highlands & Islands Enterprise took over the operation of the ski resort after the company running it, CairnGorm Mountain, was put into administration by parent company Natural Retreats, which had a 25-year-contract to run the resort, south-east of Aviemore. The closure of the funicular in September 2018 had a serious effect on its revenues.
S. Clarke
22 November 2019Common sense at last, though it all seems so blindingly obvious.
Good luck to these groups with this campaign, maybe a petition is needed.
If successful it might be a first small step in reversing the urbanisation of Scotlands wild areas, hopefully followed by restrictions on obtrusive estate roads.
Andrew Donaldson
22 November 2019Surely this is a case where the different commercial, snowsports, conservation and access interests at Cairngorm can finally be reconciled in a really fantastic, regenerative project?
Closing the road to the public south of Glenmore, removing the funicular and Ptarmagin Restaurant and building a new gondola from Glenmore to the base of the ski area, while removing most of the ski lifts and replacing with far fewer modern lifts would appear to tick most people's boxes and could be an exemplar planet friendly regeneration project that makes everyone happy!
We need to make sure HIE/the Scottish Government does not go ahead with another foolhardy, ill-considered investment to protect pride over the mistakes that have been made in the past!
Marion Boyle
22 November 2019Surely it's time to disband Highlands and Islands Enterprise altogether - they are totally incompetent
Mark
22 November 2019As above. HIE's main skillset is spending other peoples money, badly. They are a total shambles.
Ray Sefton
22 November 2019Once again we see the usual conservationists demanding that the funicular railway is removed. At the planning stage these objectors made this a very expensive project. It was impossible for HIE to make a profit, with the crazy s75 agreement and Visitor Management Plan. This should have been a first class visitor attraction, rather than a financial disaster. Using HIE figures that 200,000 people use the carpark, each year, and do other things on the hill, without putting anything into the facilities. For those who kid on that the closed system protects the SAC and SPA, approx. 3.4 million people have visited the SAC and SPA which is only 100 metres from the car park, since the funicular has been open.
For information. In addition, there are 258 Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) in Scotland, and, with the exception of access being denied to certain sites on Military establishments, I am not aware of any which restrict walkers on the grounds of conservation.
I have visited and lived in Aviemore since 1956, when Aviemore was a railway junction with a population of 500 people. Thanks to skiing and later serious tourism and mountain activities it now has a population of about 3500 people.
Whilst it might be simple to spend another £13 million of public money to remove the funicular, it would need another bucket of public money to build something to replace it. Therefore, it must be logical to repair the funicular. It would be criminal just to remove it.
I am not a skier but I have completed all the Munros and cannot accept the nonsense about protecting the landscape in Coire Cas. Let me emphasize Coire Cas, Coire na Ciste and Coire Laogh Mor are unprotected areas. This area was developed as ski area in the 1960s, with all the ski infrastructure.
Ray Sefton
22 November 2019Once again we see the usual conservationists demanding that the funicular railway is removed. At the planning stage these objectors made this a very expensive project. It was impossible for HIE to make a profit, with the crazy s75 agreement and Visitor Management Plan. This should have been a first class visitor attraction, rather than a financial disaster. HIE claim that 200,000 people use the carpark and do other things on the hill, without using any facilities. For those who kid on that the closed system protects the SAC and SPA, approx. 3.4 million people have visited the SAC and SPA which is only 100 metres from the car park, since the funicular has been open.
For information. There are 258 Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) in Scotland, and, with the exception of access being denied to certain sites on Military establishments, I am not aware of any which restrict walkers on the grounds of conservation.
I have visited and lived in Aviemore since 1956, when Aviemore was a railway junction with a population of 500 people. Thanks to skiing and later serious tourism and mountain activities it now has a population of about 3500 people.
Whilst it might be simple to spend another £13 million of public money to remove the funicular, it would need another bucket of public money to build something to replace it. Therefore, it must be logical to repair the funicular. It would be criminal just to remove it.
I am not a skier but I have completed all the Munros and cannot accept the nonsense about protecting the landscape in Coire Cas. Let me emphasize Coire Cas, Coire na Ciste and Coire Laogh Mor are unprotected areas. This area was developed as ski area in the 1960s, with all the ski infrastructure.
Sharon an Roy
23 November 2019I love the cairngorms have visited many times love going to the top and being able to walk outside and look at the views an wildlife. I have always used the furnicular and lovec the views going up and comming down. It has always been very busy with very little car spaces available so much so a 2nd car park was made. It has always been a def place to visit when in highlands.
However ..... This year we went on a saturday At beginning of November and thete were just 3 cars. We did stop to have a look but what a shock we had it was earily quiet and looked very run down note we were last thete feb 2018. The shop hardly had anything in it and the cafe was ok.
We had a walk looked at the garden that needs attention we then went and had a look at the snow machine well yes it good idea so income can be brought from skiers but what a sight
We enquired if there was a way we could go to top without walking up as I am disabled unable to do it and was told . There an ATV experience thatll take you lasts around 1 an half hr ok sounds good cost £300 for 2 ... dont think so. Way to expensive.
I think you need to look again at the repairing of the furnicular.it it would be a shame to see people unable to experience the magical beauty of the Cairngorm mountain.
I wont be visiting again untill i no there something in place for us disabled to go to the top without being ripped off
We wish you luck with your future planns
Sharon an Roy
M
12 January 2020Well said Ray.
Conservationalists are killing such an amazing natural attraction. There are plenty of mountains and unspoilt countryside elsewhere in Scotland. There is very little skiing.
This is Scotland's best skiing mountain, it's the only place it can be done. There's plenty of other places for wildlife and unspoilt views, just let us have this one for skiing. It's also good for scottish tourism and scottish economy. At least it would be if it was run properly, and without conservationalists making it unprofitable.
Also they should be allowed to run things like mountain biking in the summer to keep the money coming in on the off season.