Residents in a Lake District village say they are concerned at plans for a mile-long zipwire in the shadow of England’s third highest mountain.
The company behind the scheme, Treetop Trek, said the location at Glenridding is only one of several possible sites they are considering for the tourist attraction.
Residents attending a public meeting called by Patterdale Parish Council heard the zipwire, which would allow participants to slide at speed towards Glenridding, could stretch from the area near Greenside hostel to the village’s car park.
Dave McGowan, the Lake District National Park Authority’s head of development management, said he attended the 29 September meeting at the request of the parish council.
Mike Turner of Treetop Trek was also at the meeting, he said, and outlined his initial thoughts for a zipwire attraction. He was questioned by those attending.
Mr McGowan said: “The council had requested that I attend to answer any planning questions that might arise from the audience and I was pleased to do so.
“The Lake District National Park Authority is the local planning authority for the area and a zipwire proposal of this type would require an application for planning permission to be made.
“At present we have not received an application and if we do we will carry out consultation and publicity in the usual manner.
“We have provided some initial planning advice on the policy and planning considerations that would need to be addressed.”
Treetop Trek currently operates a high ropes and climbing net course, culminating in three parallel 250m zipwires, in woodland at the national park authority’s Brockholes centre.
Although there was strong opposition from many at the meeting, others spoke in favour of the plan, saying it would increase tourism numbers to the area.
Proposals for a 1.2km zipwire at Honister, between Borrowdale and Buttermere, were turned down by Lake District planners last year. The plans, originally conceived by late slate-mine owner Mark Weir, were opposed by the Friends of the Lake District, whose vice-president Sir Chris Bonington, who supported the application, resigned from the charity.
Planning committee members refused the application on the grounds of its impact on the landscape. The vote was split seven to four.
Greenside, a former lead-mining area 2km (1¼ miles) west of Glenridding, is home to YHA’s Helvellyn hostel and an outdoor pursuits centre. It lies on a popular route for walkers from Ullswater to Helvellyn and for skiers visiting the Lake District Ski Club’s slopes on Raise.
Mike Hyde
09 October 2014Mark Weir ... not Mark Reid
Bob
09 October 2014Our apologies for the error, which has been corrected.
MDH
10 October 2014Wish these companies would stop trying to turn the national park into a theme park. LDNPA should possibly reconsider the direction they're going too. Don't spoil the fells in the relentless pursuit for tourist money.
Henry Iddon
10 October 2014The Lake District was effected by people digging up slate / copper / lead / iron ore / wad long before tourism came along.
While I agree it is not a theme park nor should it be locked into remaining some perceived ye olde 'rural' Beatrix Potter heritage park. It has been, and I'm sure with sensitive management, will remain a living and working landscape.
Mike
13 October 2014I agree with both of you. At first glance I have less of a problem with this than I did with the Honister proposal whcih for me just involved too much intrusion into a summit area. This is much lower down in the valley in an area that has a lot of old industrial buildings, spoil heaps and habitations. It is not pristeen territory. Lets face it that area is a bit of a mess. An interesting historical mess, but a mess none the less. So it isn't really in the fells as such. But much depends upon how it would work, car parking arrangements etc. The last thing we want is a big new car park and other 'facilities' up at Greenside. It is probably less visually intrusive than the ski tow on Raise and although one might not get permission for that now, I wouldn't want to see it removed - its something different and gives great pleasure without damaging the environment. This might be similar? But size and scale are the thing. On balance - it sounds too big and too long, but there is nothing wrong in principle to new attractions to go with all the others there are. Some of us want to walk or climb, but others want to go on miniature trains, lake steamers and zip wires! Its all aboutn management