Mountain rescuers criticised the man who was today convicted of driving his 4×4 to the summit of Wales’s highest mountain, after he sparked another search during his trial.
Craig Williams of Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, was jailed for a total of 22 months at Caernarfon Crown Court after a jury found him guilty of dangerous driving.
Judge Merfyn Hughes sentenced him to six months for the first offence of driving up Snowdon, 10 months for the second offence and he added six months for failing to answer bail.
On the first day of his trial on Wednesday, Williams, 40, sent a note to his defence barrister to say he would not be attending trial as he intended to commit suicide.
This sparked a search by Llanberis Mountain Rescue Team and the North Wales Police helicopter of the mountain.
A spokesperson for the Llanberis team said: “The team was contacted by North Wales Police following the non-appearance of a person charged to appear in Caernarfon Crown Court on Wednesday morning.
“The individual had indicated in a letter to his solicitor that he would not attend the court hearing, intimating that he would be found on the summit of Snowdon.
“A team co-ordinator happened to be out walking near Clogwyn Station on Snowdon, and offered to check out the summit area and cliff lines below.”
The spokesperson said conditions on the 1,085m (3,560ft) summit were freezing, with snow cover including hard-packed areas of ice.
The team spokesperson said: “The team will always respond to a request from the police to investigate a mountain incident.
“On this occasion it was possible to report that nothing of any significance was found near the summit.
“However, the team is a very busy team. It should be noted that it attended to 176 incidents during 2012.
“In fact this callout was instigated because the person involved provided false information to the police. It meant that the team was greatly inconvenienced for a couple of hours on an unnecessary callout, searching a potentially hazardous location.
“The team is made up of volunteers who willingly turn out in all conditions to help people in distress.
“However, it takes a very dim view of individuals who, on purpose, create situations where valuable time and resources are wasted and in particular where life might potentially be endangered.”
Williams denied the charges of dangerous driving though he admitted driving his Vauxhall Frontera up the Llanberis path to within 200m of the summit in September 2011. He claimed on a second occasion later that month when the same vehicle was found parked at the Hafod Eryri summit building, he had not been the driver.
But the jury found him guilty on both counts and the judge sentenced him to serve the jail terms consecutively. He was also banned from driving for three years and ordered to take an extended driving test.
Dave
18 January 2013He got no more than he deserved.
D Sullivan
18 January 2013The law again is an ass. A thief who steals from a shop could be caught three times and would receive a fine not a prison sentence. A thug commiting a serious assault and causing personal injury would receive a lesser sentence. Even the rioters who behaved abysmally in the riots last year were not given sentences as long as this. Driving up snowdon caused no personal injury to anyone. The damage caused was much less than the thousands of people that walk up there every year not to mention those that put themselves and their rescuers at risk by being ill clothed and ill prepared, . Wheres the sign that says you are not permitted to drive on snowdon, there arent even signs saying that its potentially dangerous to walk there to stop the flipflop and shorts brigade from setting off to the summit at three in the afternoon, Let the punishment fit the crime. By no stretch of imagination was this such a heinous crime that a prison sentence of that length or even any prison sentence should have been meted out, DS Ffestiniog
Alasdair
19 January 2013wow, bit excessive, didn't hurt anybody, didn't damage anybody's property or take it away from them, nobody's worse off. 22 months? When you can speed and kill somebody on a normal road and not get anything?
The man's obviously a selfish idiot, but that shouldn't be punished like this when there are so many other seriously harmful crimes to punish as well.
Keith
19 January 2013Where do you get the spelling 'Caernarvon' from? Haven't seen that in years, you get it right the second time in the same article, 'Caernarfon'. :-)
Bob
19 January 2013Our apologies for the misspelling, which has been corrected.
Bob Smith
Editor
Mountain Janet
19 January 2013The judge heard all the evidence, he was made aware of all the circumstances - a lot of which has not been published by the media - and was not impressed by the defendants behaviour. This man was a menace on an iconic mountain and needed to be taught a lesson but more than that the sentence needed to act as a deterrent to others. The judge got it spot on.
Craig Williams (The 4x4 driver)
26 September 2013Well it's safe to say that in 60-70mph gail force winds no one was on the landscape! Only an individual at 18 stone would be able to withstand those forces..... (worked out prior to newtons 3 laws of motion, thus the gravitational cause and effect of 6.68NM2..... So show me any 18 stone person who wants to trudge out in -2 to ascend a 3,500 Summit?
So with a 2.2T specially designed 4x4 to hold me down firm on the ground built by my own hands (with x2 winches - 1 front & 1 rear both with the motors revolving at the same rate so 1 cable does not slaken whilst using both at the same time - the rear winch cable goes underneath the undercarraige which was all incased and come out through the front) and a highly skilfulled advanced off-terrain driver (X - M.O.D vehicle technician & field engineer tester/driver for all manner of land defence vehicles) with respect to such a landscape and had prior worked out all the gradients, depressions, angularities, pitches etc, etc. I personally never did feel it was a danger to anybody. The Prosecution however, like usual exaggerated the whole issue (probably never stepped a foot on the mountain?) and here I am a lamb to the slaughter, like walking into a Roman Arena to unleash every onslaught from the lungs of hell on me! ....oh yes and the Judge Merfyn Hughes...well say no more! It was inevitable I was not walking out right from the very beginning in Sept. which is safe. The Jury are standard laymen... people who have never traversed anything more than i slight uphill tarmac road so would never in a million years understand any slow, crawling locking diff 4x4 technique Sorry to the mountain rescue services, the sponsership money of over £1,500 accrued to be supplied to you never made it your way..... please point the finger at the authorities for 'culling' those funds. Everything the media printed before trial 'sensationalised' and 'hyped' up the real truth. This is what makes good juicy press & reports. It sowed a seed to the general public that BELIEVED everything they read..... Maybe read Aristotle, Plato, Isaac Newton, Erwin Schrodinger, Zen and art of motor mechanics, Stephen Hawkins... anything about the 13.7 billion years of creation from a singularity and Cosmic particles. Lipids - single cell life frozen in -286 degrees in Space arriving to our Earths sufice by asteroids & meteorites during the 'heavy bonbardment' and producing a chemical reaction with our atmospheric conditions..... H2o, nitrates, oxygen and photosynthesis spawning life.... maybe consider Edwin Hubble's expanding Universe to realize we are but another race awaiting to be wiped out.... Then tell me if you think what was done was wrong?
We have the best part of 80 years on this once-around-ride, Nothing before... Nothing afterwards (Trust me on this one!) The 'social order' is like watching 'The invention of lying' by Ricky Gervais. So sorry to all those who thought it was wrong...IT WASN'T... and there IS still more to come! Just to put the cherry ontop of the cake so-to-speak.
Watch this space for more UN-dangerous action!
James Harrison
21 March 2016I'm surprised that Top Gear didn't get there first... Craig has been used as the example that the authorities don't want it to happen again, and it certainly seems that the overblown is usually found in legal cases. It would have been very good to have had an organised 'charity' drive done instead, so that it was permitted, and everybody won. Maybe next time.