More than 33,000 people have voiced their opposition to coalition Government plans to sell off up to half of the publicly owned and managed forests in England.
And both the Scottish Government and Welsh Assembly Government say their forests are not up for grabs, as the environmental justification of Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs secretary Caroline Spelman’s decision was questioned.
At the time of writing, just over 33,000 names had been added to the 38 Degrees online petition against the carve-up of the Forestry Commission.
Labour’s shadow Defra spokeswoman Mary Creagh said: “Caroline Spelman settled early in the comprehensive spending review and her department is losing a third of its budget.
“This Government said they would be the greenest government ever yet they plan to sell off England’s forests in an act of environmental vandalism. We will see private companies cherry-picking sites for commercial development and voluntary organisations left to look after the rest with no budget to do so properly.
“Whatever cash the Tories get from this will not reflect the forests’ true value in terms of public access, biodiversity and combating climate change.”
And Friends of the Earth’s director of policy and campaigns Craig Bennett said: “The Government claims its motivation behind these proposals is to increase community involvement in the management of woodlands and forests, but if its real intention is to sell off much loved sites to make a quick buck, its vision of a Big Society is somewhat questionable.
“Forests are worth less in hard cash to the Government than their value to the nation, which is priceless. A lot of Forestry Commission land is critically important for wildlife conservation, for regulating our climate and protecting us from flooding, as well as being beautiful places for us to enjoy.
“Friends of the Earth spent many years campaigning for strong legislation which should continue to protect our most important wildlife sites – whoever owns them.
“But all areas of woodland and countryside need careful management to maximise their benefits for wildlife and people, and until the Government is able to show how this will be achieved in private hands, we think they should remain in public ownership.”
Wales’ rural affairs minister Elin Jones said: “Forestry is a devolved matter and decisions affecting the future of Wales’s national forests lie with Welsh Ministers, not with Westminster.
“I believe the national forest is an important asset to Wales, providing access, employment, support for the timber and tourism industries and has a major role to play in helping us to tackle climate change.
“The activities of the Forestry Commission in Wales are currently under review as part of the wider review of environmental delivery bodies which will be concluded early next year. I am also in contact with my counterparts in England and Scotland to ensure that the needs of Wales are considered as part of any proposals to change the management of forestry in England.”
It was a view echoed by the Scottish Government’s environment minster Roseanna Cunningham, who said: “Forestry has been a devolved matter since April 2003. It is quite clearly a matter for Scottish ministers to determine the future of Forestry Commission Scotland and the national forest estate in Scotland – it is certainly not a decision for Westminster.
“There may be a review of forestry in England but that does not include Scotland. This review has no remit whatsoever north of the border.
“We are certainly living in very difficult and challenging times and with swingeing cuts being imposed on Scotland we need to plan carefully for this.
“The Scottish Government is continuing to look for opportunities to simplify and streamline public bodies in Scotland and Forestry Commission Scotland, along with other public bodies, will be part of that ongoing process.
“However, let me be quite clear, we have no plans to dispose of the national forest estate in Scotland and there is no review of Forestry Commission Scotland being undertaken.
“I do have considerable concerns over the review of Forestry Commission England and its potential impact in Scotland therefore I have written to my counterparts in England and Wales to suggest a meeting to discuss issues surrounding forestry.
“The Scottish Government views Scotland’s forests as a source of national pride and an important public asset which can help deliver many benefits in economic, environmental and social terms.”
Disposal of the Forestry Commission’s assets would need legislation in the Westminster Parliament and at Holyrood and the National Assembly for Wales.
Britain’s forests have evolved from their origin as a source of timber for the nation to include much recreational activity, with access guaranteed to walkers and many other outdoor activities such as mountain biking.
Removing access from any forests to be sold off would be highly contentious, but their worth to commercial buyers would be severely diminished if present access arrangements were kept.
But it emerged that the Public Bodies Bill being introduced in the House of Commons, will introduce sweeping powers for the Government that would allow public bodies to be sold off or abolished without the need to pass further laws.
Open spaces Kate
01 November 2010We need to read the Public Bodies Bill very carefully, it gives the government far-reaching powers to abolish, merge and completely change the public bodies with little opportunity for intervention. If it goes through, nothing is safe. It has second reading in the Lords on 9 November so there's not much time.
toni smith
03 November 2010Leave our forests alone! Britain needs its green spaces!
Marie McGrath
05 November 2010The House of Lords says that the public bodies bill "strikes at the very heart of our constitutional system".
The government is using that bill to sell off our forests.
Clauses 17-19 cover the Forestry Commission. They give the Secretary of State powers to make an order amending the 1967 Forestry Act 1967, including managing, using, letting and disposing of forestry land.
This means there would be no parliamentary debate and strikes at the notion that only Parliament may amend or repeal primary legislation.
If you love your forests, email, write to or visit your MP. Ask them to oppose Clauses 17-19 of the Public Bodies bill.
Time is short, the government wants this legislation on the statute book as quickly as possible.
M.Williams
25 January 2011I think it is a disgraceful plan by the govt and makes no financial sense.The millionares in Govt and their friends are the ones most likely to benefit from this proposal. The majority of people in this country are opposed, and are savvy enough to know what would happen once a sale of our precious woodlands went ahead. How dare they try to dispose of our heritage like this.
Johnmichael Downs
27 January 2011I have read an article in a satirical magazine of an instance where a parcel of forest had been recently sold for £60000. The new owner immediatly applied for a grant under the English Woodland Grant Scheme to grow and cut timber and was given a grant of £55000....nice work!!
Alfredo Borras-Orejas
27 January 2011THE SAD TRUTH IS THAT ENGLAND IS ONE OF THE LESS FORESTED COUNTRIES IN EUROPE. IT DOESN'T EVEN REACH THE 10% WHILE FRANCE, FOR INSTANCE, HAS MORE THAN 30% OF FOREST' SURFACE. EVEN SPAIN, WHERE IT SELDOM RAINS, HAS MUCH MORE FOREST LAND THAN ENGLAND. AND NOW THEY WANT TO SELL WHAT'S LEFT . MONEY COMES AND GOES BUT A COUNTRY IS ITS LANDSCAPES AND ITS PEOPLE AND WE DON'T WANT ENGLAND TO BECOME JUST A GRASS DESERT. THEY ARE GOING TO SELL THEM TO COMPANIES THAT ARE GOING TO MAKE MONEY OUT OF THEM. SO ALL THE TREES WILL BE GONE.